The War of Ideas

Jane Austen and the War of Ideas: Pride and Prejudice
By Marilyn Butler


What is the writer's thesis?
Despite the common assumption that Pride and Prejudice is a progressive novel (promoting class equality), Jane Austin intended it to convey a conservative theme (orthodox Christian morals).

What are one or two key points the writer makes in support of the thesis?
Butler works to discredit progressive interpreter Samuel Kliger’s theory that the novel contrasts art (of noble society) and nature (of Elizabeth and, deep down, of all people). Butler instead suggests the novels true battle is between the candor of Jane & Mr. Bingley and the satire of Elizabeth & Mr. Darcy.
Butler also cites one of Jane Austen’s letters as proof that even she thought the novel was too light for the progressive impression to hold much weight.


Were you persuaded? Do you agree with the writer's thesis? Why?
I agree with both the progressive and the conservative interpretation; who says a novel much be confined to one or the other? The time period certainly was one of changing class distinctions and equality, but at the same time there is no denying the obvious lessons both Elizabeth and Mr. Dary learned about (gasp) pride and prejudice.

In what way(s) does this information give you new or increased understanding of the novel or of Jane Austen as a writer?
I tend to read novels for pleasure first, before trying to draw a meaning out of it. Butler’s criticism, above all else, brought to my attentions the previously cited obvious moral lessons both Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy learned. I think I overlooked Elizabeth’s pride and prejudice in criticizing everyone around her because I, myself, tend to do that, and therefore, didn’t see anything strange about the main character’s inner thoughts.